n addition to implementing asbestos safety measures, California has
long been one of the leading jurisdictions for asbestos lawsuit filings.
Early asbestos lawsuits were generally filed in areas, including
California, where significant numbers of workers had been exposed to
asbestos. In the 1970s and 1980s, California was one of four states
that accounted for more than 60 percent of state asbestos case filings.
By 2000, the majority of asbestos filings occurred in a handful of
other states, such as Texas.
Not all of these new case filings resulted in verdicts (e.g., they
were dismissed or settled). However, from 1993 through 2001, California
was among five states that accounted for 65 percent of asbestos trials
that ended in verdicts.
Since 2000, some states with a significant amount of asbestos lawsuits
began enacting laws to limit new filings. California has not enacted
similar laws. Meanwhile, some of the state's courts have reportedly
experienced increases in the number of asbestos case filings by both
in-state and out-of-state claimants each year.
Although California has not enacted some of the reform laws that
have been popular in other states, its courts have taken other measures
to manage large asbestos caseloads and expedite claims by extremely ill
patients. For instance, a "fast-track" scheduling approach allows
cases of terminally ill patients to go to trial in 120 days. In
addition, at least some judges actively encourage the parties to
resolve cases quickly through trial or settlement.
No comments:
Post a Comment